        
To
add your name to the SATI Mailing List,
click here
|
|
Advocates and Confidentiality
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Presenter: |
Leslie A. Hagen,
Assistant United States Attorney, Western District of Michigan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Date/Time:
Friday, April 25, 2003 / 10:00-11:30am |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abstract: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The proper
creation, maintenance and handling of records and information
obtained from and about victims of domestic violence and sexual
assault is a critical function of any advocacy program,
regardless of whether the program is governmental (police or
prosecutorial victim-witness program) or external (usually
nonprofit) in nature. Improper handling of victim information
and records can cause great harm to individual victims and the
reputation of the agency. Most external domestic violence and
sexual assault advocacy programs have strong confidentiality
policies and that fact is advertised as one of the advantages of
their programming. On the other hand, governmental advocacy
programs probably will have limitations on the confidentiality
of communications between victims and advocates, primarily
because the advocacy program may be one component of a larger
office whose primary goal is the prosecution of crimes. This
difference in confidentiality rules can prove confusing for
victims working with advocates in both systems.
This workshop will explore the different roles, goals and legal
obligations that advocates must comply with depending on their
credentials and place of employment. Training topics will
include:
-
Privilege: what
is it and who owns it
-
Record keeping
-
Communicating
limitations on confidentiality to the client
-
General
principles for setting policy on confidentiality
-
Suggested
practices for responding to subpoenas and warrants
-
The
difficulties of maintaining confidentiality in an era of
collaboration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go To:
|
|
|
> Main
Conference Page
> Registration Form
|
|